Because regardless of this sentiment, this remains 100% a business and marketing maneuver. If they really wanted to do something positive, they could do it without advertising their merchandise while doing so. As it's not genuine. This is no different than the Madden nfl 21 coins coronavirus commercials. They could have said nothing in any way. Rather, they brought positive attention to the protests. That is good. Solidarity or else they realize a decent chunk of the audience is obsessed with something more important than a damn videogame? Man. These comments really emphasize the nihilistic character of reddit users. Yes, this really is a provider. Yes, it has something to do with marketing. But Jesus, can not we be happy that companies are saying something? Do you not understand how much of an effect this could create? In the event the firm ignored the situation, it would give every checked out mind the concept that what is happening is normal and regular.
EA does not care about people who are not investors. Eliminating Kaepernick's name out of songs in Madden 2 years in a row shows it. Businesses don't want one to defend themlet their attorneys do this work. EDIT: Let me be clear. But we shouldn't praise a company for attaining the absolute bare minimum. You are not trendy and ethical for thanking companies for not spitting on you. We should praise firms who reveal patterns of positivity. Feel free to disagree, but please don't act like this specific case is this incredibly complex morally-grey situation. I mean I thought there were pretty strict regulations on whose names and likeliness may be utilized in Madden. Like Belicheck and Payton aren't in Madden since they are not part of the NFLCA and that is who EA has a contract with. They might have to pay Kap if his title is used and therefore are likely avoiding that. That and Kap isn't just welcome from the NFL planet (not talking about lovers ) anymore.
They both backpeddled and apologized if they were called out. They don't have rights to Kap's likeness from the game but they could mention him in the tune (as they have plenty of additional people figures in other songs). The fact that they did so two years in a row suggests it was not an innocent oversight but a genuine choice to collaborate with a fundamentally racist act of collusion inside the NFL. I am not defending a provider. I am not saying EA is a bastion of social justice. Many people generally (not merely reddit) can't see past black and white. Cynicism inspires outrage and outrage inspires clicks. That is why negativity floats to the top in all social media. This is a significant factor. Youtube for one has completed research, since it is a huge part of their company and they would like to know it. There's been testimony to congress about it that I've watched but can't find at this time. What they need is engagement and the more negatively framed something is the more people will click it as it comes up on your recommendations.
Businesses do not need you to defend themlet their lawyers do this work. "Firms do not need one to defend them", but somehow attacking companies when they're doing the right thing is essential and productive?It does not matter if it is for PR reasons, they are still increasing awareness for this issue and hurting nobody by doing this procedure. Meanwhile the people who see this as an chance to attack are only perpetuating a negative atmosphere of constant whining. It is not so much about"protecting businesses" but about attacking this needless negativity. So you're really just adding to the man's argument by doing precisely what he described. They're not doing anything though. They simply published a statement full of cheap Mut 21 coins empty rhetoric. You know what doing something is? Not making another Madden game since the NFL punished players like Kaepernick for taking a knee. That would be impressive. However, we all know that's not what is going to happen.
